In typical lawyerly fashion, as I was driving behind a toxic chemicals hauling truck the other day, I harkened back to my law school days, and began to daydream about ultrahazardous activities, and the accompanying strict liability standards. It struck me that it is perhaps uncommon to think in these terms when driving along the freeway, but also that many people might not be aware of these legal creations.
Ultrahazardous activities are those activities that are considered so dangerous, that they are almost certain to result in some sort of disastrous consequence. Think of transporting highly toxic chemicals or flammable gasses, exploding dynamite, etc. Because these activities are so obviously risky, the damages they can cause are generally held to a strict liability standard, meaning that if an accident happens, the company is probably liable, regardless of intent.
Strict liability for ultrahazardous activities is a remnant of Tort, or civil, rather than Criminal Law. Strict liability, however, does exist for several different types of crimes.
- Statutory Rape-- many, if not all, statutory rape offenses are strict liability crimes. This means that even if a person believed that the victim was of age, even if they attempted to externally verify their age (such as by checking a driver's license), they are still guilty of the crime if they engage in an illegal sexual act with the minor. The term statutory in the offense's title hints at the fact that the crime is considered more like a regulatory infraction (see below), where proof of intent is not required.
- Parking violations-- these offenses, along with other regulatory offenses or infractions, usually do not require an additional element of proving intent. If the person is in violation of the rule, they are "guilty." E.g. if a police officer sees a cellphone in your hand, you are in violation of the no handheld law.
- Manslaughter-- this is generally the type of murder whereby a person's negligence leads to the death of another. Therefore, it's the completion of the negligent actions that satisfies the violation, eventhough the person did not intend to kill the victim.
Bankruptcy – Business
Bankruptcy – Personal
Criminal Law – Appellate
Criminal Law – Federal
Criminal Law – State Felony & Misdemeanor
Drunk Driving Defense
Dumb or Weird Laws
GM Ignition Switch
Stryker Hip Replacement
Intellectual Property Law
Labor & Employment Law
Landlord Tenant Law
Personal Injury – Defendant
Personal Injury – Plaintiff
Social Security Disability
Weird Law Friday
Trending Searches#TBT #ThrowbackThursday constitutional law Criminal Law - State Felony & Misdemeanor dangerous or defective products divorce DUI dumb laws estate planning Events that Changed History Family Law FAQ first-amendment product-recall products liability random laws recall safety recall strange laws weird laws