<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawinfo Weblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com</link>
	<description>Lawyer Blog &#124; Attorney Blog &#124; Read and Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:35:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Power Lunches Losing Popularity Among Lawyers?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/10/power-lunches-losing-popularity-among-lawyers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/10/power-lunches-losing-popularity-among-lawyers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal profession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lunching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social-networking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I came across this <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/robert-half-legal-survey-shows-lawyers-conducting-fewer-business-lunches-2012-02-09" title="legal lunch article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">article</a>, by Market Watch, based on a survey conducted by Robert Half Legal, which details the decreasing incidence of lawyers taking &#8220;business lunches&#8221; to meet with potential clients or business partners.<a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iStock_000008014487XSmall.jpg" class="liimagelink"></a></p> <p id="">The lawyers taking the survey were asked, &#8220;In your opinion, are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/10/power-lunches-losing-popularity-among-lawyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird Law of the Day: Psychiatrists Must Dress as Wizards When Testifying</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/10/weird-law-of-the-day-psychiatrists-must-dress-as-wizards-when-testifying/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/10/weird-law-of-the-day-psychiatrists-must-dress-as-wizards-when-testifying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dumb or Weird Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert witness testimony laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satirical laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weird laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wizard laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>This week&#8217;s weird law is thanks to one of my relatives, who found it in the course of searching the internet, presumably, for something other than a weird law. But nonetheless, this one&#8217;s pretty funny, at least I think so.</p> <p><a href="http://bc-injury-law.com/blog/making-psychiatrists-dress-wizards" title="Wizard Law" target="_blank" class="liexternal">Apparently</a>, during the 1990s, New Mexico had what one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/10/weird-law-of-the-day-psychiatrists-must-dress-as-wizards-when-testifying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Legal Event: Brown Family Has Standing to Challenge Utah&#8217;s Polygamy Statute</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/current-legal-event-brown-family-has-standing-to-challenge-utahs-polygamy-statute/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/current-legal-event-brown-family-has-standing-to-challenge-utahs-polygamy-statute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear of prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage-laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polygamy in utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The stars of TLC&#8217;s popular show &#8220;Sister Wives&#8221; survived a motion to dismiss in their lawsuit against the state&#8217;s polygamy law (<a href="http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE76/htm/76_07_010100.htm" title="Utah Bigamy Law" target="_blank" class="liexternal">Utah Code Ann. § 76-7-101</a>). The family had decided to become a part of the TLC show after it had observed and received assurances that polygamist families were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/current-legal-event-brown-family-has-standing-to-challenge-utahs-polygamy-statute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Legislature Approves Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/washington-legislature-approves-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/washington-legislature-approves-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current legal events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new state laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This Wednesday, the Washington State House of Representatives <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2012/02/08/washington-house-votes-to-legalize.html" title="WA gay marriage article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">passed</a> a gay marriage bill, that had already passed in the Senate, by a vote of 55-43. Governor Chis Gregoire is expected to sign it into law within five days. The<br /> outcome of the vote was allegedly uncertain due to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/washington-legislature-approves-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recently Recalled Food Products</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/08/recently-recalled-food-products/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/08/recently-recalled-food-products/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dangerous Products / Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aunt jemima recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby calming comfort lotion recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous or defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[egg salad sandwich recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food poisoning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jammy sammy recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recalled products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Recent Recalls</p> <p></p> <p>The following products have recently been recalled.  The products are categorized by reason for recall. While meant to be informative, please remember that this list is not exhaustive. If you suspect an item you have has been recalled, or if for example you have recently suffered from food poisoning, you can contact the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/08/recently-recalled-food-products/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Reminder From the FDA: Dietary Supplements Are Not Regulated</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/08/a-reminder-from-the-fda-dietary-supplements-are-not-regulated/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/08/a-reminder-from-the-fda-dietary-supplements-are-not-regulated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dangerous Products / Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous-products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dietary supplements warning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Does the fda regulate supplements?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda regulating supplements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight loss supplements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In addition to the typical post detailing recent consumer product recalls, I wanted to take this opportunity to highlight a page created by the FDA on Dietary Supplements. The Food and Drug Administration, like other governmental agencies, will often post informative pages to its website, warning consumers of dangerous conditions or scams that are currently taking [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/08/a-reminder-from-the-fda-dietary-supplements-are-not-regulated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas Golfer Could Lose Leg From Stabbing</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/texas-golfer-could-lose-leg-from-stabbing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/texas-golfer-could-lose-leg-from-stabbing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Witzmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Catastrophic Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golfer stabbed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[golfing stab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[playing ahead in golf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[violence on the golf course]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Needless to say golf is not a contact sport. The only threatened contact in golf is the chance that a ball hit awry could glance off your person as you traverse the links. However, these situations are unlikely and can often times be avoided if the golfer yells &#8220;Four.&#8221; Keeping this in mind there is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/texas-golfer-could-lose-leg-from-stabbing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>12 Law Schools Added To Student Class Action Suit</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/12-law-schools-added-to-student-class-action-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/12-law-schools-added-to-student-class-action-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Witzmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defrauding employment data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifying employment data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tier three law school]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Prospective law students look at a multitude of factors before deciding which school to attend. Some of these factors include prestige, scholarships, location, quality of professors etc. However, the most important statistic for most law students is the percentage of graduates that are employed soon. Thus, these students expect that the school&#8217;s published graduate employment [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/12-law-schools-added-to-student-class-action-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Man Calls Ambulance, Gets Tased (3 Times)!</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/man-calls-ambulance-gets-tased-3-times/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/man-calls-ambulance-gets-tased-3-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[man gets tased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[police use taser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to his <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/06/Bizarre.pdf" title="tase complaint" target="_blank" class="lipdf">complaint</a>, Roland Haas, was working as a teacher/teacher&#8217;s aide at the Under the Magic Pine Tree when he began to feel light headed. He then entered a hallway, and abruptly fell, presumably having passed out. One of his coworkers then called 911, believing he may have suffered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/man-calls-ambulance-gets-tased-3-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Practice Area Spotlight: Labor &amp; Employment</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/practice-area-spotlight-labor-employment/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/practice-area-spotlight-labor-employment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Frequently Asked Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor & Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor and employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LawInfo resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual-harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Labor and Employment law hasn&#8217;t always been as favorable to workers, nor has it even required reasonable working conditions. In fact, if you my post on <a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/09/01/featured-case-that-helped-shape-the-united-states-lochner-v-new-york/" title="Lochner" class="liinternal">Lochner v. New York</a>, details the Supreme Court&#8217;s take, at the time, that people could work as hard and as long as they &#8220;wanted to.&#8221; In other [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/practice-area-spotlight-labor-employment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

