<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawinfo Weblog &#187; Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com</link>
	<description>Lawyer Blog &#124; Attorney Blog &#124; Read and Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:32:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Text Messages Increasingly Used as Evidence in Divorce Cases</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/13/text-messages-increasingly-used-as-evidence-in-divorce-cases/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/13/text-messages-increasingly-used-as-evidence-in-divorce-cases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cheating through text messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text messages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting as proof of infedelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texting used in divorce cases]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I thought <a href="http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Divorce-Smartphone-Evidence-Facebook-Text-messages,news-14121.html" title="smartphones evidence" target="_blank" class="liexternal">this </a>article discussing the advent of smartphones, and their influence on divorces, was interesting. What I gleaned from the text, no pun intended, was the notion that the increasing amount of written communication creates an increasingly tangible trail. <a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iStock_000019088715XSmall.jpg" class="liimagelink"></a>Thus, spouses searching for evidence of infidelity, or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/13/text-messages-increasingly-used-as-evidence-in-divorce-cases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Newborn DNA Collection Class Action</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/20/minnesota-newborn-dna-collection-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/20/minnesota-newborn-dna-collection-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn baby testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota Newborn Screening Program Keeps Minors&#8217; DNA for Testing, Etc. </p> <p>A class action comprised of parents of newborns in Minnesota is <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/19/43164.htm" title="Minnesota DNA Class Action" target="_blank" class="liexternal">suing</a> the state, its Department of Health, and its commissioner, claiming that they have violated the state&#8217;s Genetic Privacy Act, which took effect in 2006. The Act was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/20/minnesota-newborn-dna-collection-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Catch A Predator Faces Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/07/to-catch-a-predator-faces-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/07/to-catch-a-predator-faces-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fourth amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Predator&#8221; Sues &#8220;To Catch a Predator&#8221; &#38; NBC</p> <p>I read <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/10/27/40991.htm" title="To Catch a Predator" target="_blank" class="liexternal">this</a> article a while ago about the NBC show, &#8220;To Catch a Predator,&#8221; and then when I saw the show air this weekend, I thought it was worth broaching the topic: what protections should these potential predators be entitled [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/07/to-catch-a-predator-faces-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muslim Woman Sues Southwest Airlines After Being Thrown Off Flight</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/10/14/muslim-woman-sues-southwest-airlines-after-being-thrown-off-flight/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/10/14/muslim-woman-sues-southwest-airlines-after-being-thrown-off-flight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Witzmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aviation Accidents/Disasters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim removed from flight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism scare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thrown off flight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=12282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Muslim woman who was recently forced off of a Southwest Airlines flight departing from San Diego has decided to sue Southwest, according to <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/southwest-airlines-sued-by-muslim-woman-they-removed-from-flight/2011/10/11/gIQAu6b4cL_blog.html" target="_blank" class="liexternal">Washingtonpost.com</a>.</p> <p>Back in March before her plane had taken off from San Diego Irum Abbassi was on her cellphone with a Verizon representative when she notified the representative [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/10/14/muslim-woman-sues-southwest-airlines-after-being-thrown-off-flight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is Defamation?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/09/13/what-is-defamation/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/09/13/what-is-defamation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 15:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Frequently Asked Questions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[being sued for defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamation lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elements of defamation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false statements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libel and slander]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/defamation/Federal/what-is-defamation-.html" title="What is defamation?" class="liexternal">What Exactly is Defamation?</a></p> <p><a href="http://www.lawinfo.com/defamation.html" title="Defamation" class="liexternal">Defamation</a> occurs when a person makes a false statement about another person causing them some sort of measurable harm. It is somewhat like the legal equivalent of gossip. In order to successfully prove that defamation has occurred, a plaintiff must prove that defendant [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/09/13/what-is-defamation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Security Wrongly Declares Thousands Dead Each Year.</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/25/social-security-wrongly-declares-thousands-dead-each-year/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/25/social-security-wrongly-declares-thousands-dead-each-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Blanchard, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mistakenly declared dead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security death mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thousands erroneously declared dead each year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Imagine waking up one sunny, beautiful day only to be told that you were dead. It sounds like an interesting story line for a movie or perhaps a weird dream but unfortunately it <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2011/08/17/pf/social_security_deaths_mistakes/index.htm" title="Social Security Death Mistakes" target="_blank" class="liexternal">appears that Social Security does exactly that </a>to thousands of people each year – even [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/25/social-security-wrongly-declares-thousands-dead-each-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Implications of the Defense of Marriage Act on Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/25/legal-implications-of-the-defense-of-marriage-act-on-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/25/legal-implications-of-the-defense-of-marriage-act-on-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense of marriage act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marraige]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the right for gays to marry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gay Marriage: Separate but Equal? <p>This weekend gay couples were wed by the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/york-state-celebrates-first-same-sex-marriages-015401234.html" target="_blank" class="liexternal">hundreds</a>.New York is the sixth state to legalize gay marriage. However, gay couples still face a litany of legal issues so long as The Defense of Marriage Act (&#8220;DOMA&#8221;), remains in place.</p> <p>Among other provisions, DOMA recognizes marriage as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/25/legal-implications-of-the-defense-of-marriage-act-on-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can You Be Fired For Smoking Medical Marijuana?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/11/can-you-be-fired-for-smoking-medical-marijuana/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/11/can-you-be-fired-for-smoking-medical-marijuana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 12:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sweet, Esq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor & Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fired for failing drug test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical marijuana fired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington medical marijuana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=10607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In some states, those suffering from certain diseases are given medical marijuana cards.  This allows those patients to purchase, or grow, a certain amount of marijuana to help treat their illness.  However, despite some states allowing people to utilize marijuana, it is still an illegal drug to the federal government.  This juxtaposition of standards has [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/11/can-you-be-fired-for-smoking-medical-marijuana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should A Company Be Able To Drug Test Everyone, Regardless Of Suspected Drug Use?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/02/should-a-company-be-able-to-drug-test-everyone-regardless-of-suspected-drug-use/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/02/should-a-company-be-able-to-drug-test-everyone-regardless-of-suspected-drug-use/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sweet, Esq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug testing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug testing florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug testing privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug testing public employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal drug testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=10474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When you join a company, you usually are required to sign an employment contract.  This contract contains several provisions, including the right to drug test you.  Usually, a company will reserve the right to drug test someone if they believe you may be under the influence of drugs.  However, in Florida, the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/06/02/aclu-challenges-drug-testing-of-florida-employees/" target="_blank" [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/02/should-a-company-be-able-to-drug-test-everyone-regardless-of-suspected-drug-use/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Police Be Able To Stop And Frisk Taxi Passengers?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/05/29/should-police-be-able-to-stop-and-frisk-taxi-passengers/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/05/29/should-police-be-able-to-stop-and-frisk-taxi-passengers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 23:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sweet, Esq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nypd searching taxi passenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nypd taxi search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nypd trip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passenger search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trip program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=10444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When someone is pulled over by the police, they are subject to a visual search.  If the officer believes that there is illegal activity or they fear for their safety, a police officer can generally frisk the person.  However, the latest New York law based upon the Taxi/Livery Robbery Inspection Program (<a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/nypd/html/crime_prevention/crime_prevention_section.shtml" target="_blank" class="liexternal">TRIP</a>).</p> [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/05/29/should-police-be-able-to-stop-and-frisk-taxi-passengers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

