<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawinfo Weblog &#187; Litigation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/category/litigation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com</link>
	<description>Lawyer Blog &#124; Attorney Blog &#124; Read and Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Current Legal Event: Brown Family Has Standing to Challenge Utah&#8217;s Polygamy Statute</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/current-legal-event-brown-family-has-standing-to-challenge-utahs-polygamy-statute/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/current-legal-event-brown-family-has-standing-to-challenge-utahs-polygamy-statute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fear of prosecution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriage-laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polygamy in utah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Utah laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The stars of TLC&#8217;s popular show &#8220;Sister Wives&#8221; survived a motion to dismiss in their lawsuit against the state&#8217;s polygamy law (<a href="http://le.utah.gov/~code/TITLE76/htm/76_07_010100.htm" title="Utah Bigamy Law" target="_blank" class="liexternal">Utah Code Ann. § 76-7-101</a>). The family had decided to become a part of the TLC show after it had observed and received assurances that polygamist families were [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/current-legal-event-brown-family-has-standing-to-challenge-utahs-polygamy-statute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pornography is not Copyrightable, Complaint Alleges</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/06/pornography-is-not-copyrightable-complaint-alleges/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/06/pornography-is-not-copyrightable-complaint-alleges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obscene material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In an interesting turn of events, a woman sued for copyright infringement, from <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/03/43613.htm" title="porno article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">allegedly</a> illegally downloading a pornographic movie, is <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/03/HardDrive2.pdf" title="copyright complaint" target="_blank" class="lipdf">suing</a> the owner of the movie&#8217;s rights, demanding relief from the prior lawsuit, claiming the material was not copyrightable in the first place.</p> <p><a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iStock_000013195362XSmall.jpg" class="liimagelink"></a>According to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/06/pornography-is-not-copyrightable-complaint-alleges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Law Fallout: Asian American Rights Committee of California Sues to Enjoin Shark Fin Ban</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/03/new-law-fallout-asian-american-rights-committee-of-california-sues-to-enjoin-shark-fin-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/03/new-law-fallout-asian-american-rights-committee-of-california-sues-to-enjoin-shark-fin-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ban on shark fin soup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protecting sharks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shark fin soup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16039</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Asian American Rights Committee of California filed <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/02/SharkFin.pdf" title="Shark Fin lawsuit" target="_blank" class="lipdf">suit</a> against the state of California last month, seeking an injunction and declaratory judgment invalidating the state&#8217;s <a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/30/new-laws-to-take-effect-in-2012/" title="new laws 2012" class="liinternal">new Shark Fin ban</a>.</p> <p>The law generally makes it a crime for any person to possess without a permit (which is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/03/new-law-fallout-asian-american-rights-committee-of-california-sues-to-enjoin-shark-fin-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions: Class Actions</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/27/frequently-asked-questions-class-actions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/27/frequently-asked-questions-class-actions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmful products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Frequently Asked Questions: Class Actions</p> <p>Class actions are something that we hear a lot about in the news, but they aren&#8217;t usually explained in detail. For example, what does it mean that someone is filing a class action? In general, a <a href="http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Class-Action/Federal/what-is-a-class-action-lawsuit.html" title="what is a class action" target="_blank" class="liexternal">class action</a> is a lawsuit that is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/27/frequently-asked-questions-class-actions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parents Sue After Child Dies During Wisdom Tooth Surgery</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/16/parents-sue-after-child-dies-during-wisdom-tooth-surgery/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/16/parents-sue-after-child-dies-during-wisdom-tooth-surgery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Witzmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death at the dentist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom tooth death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisdom tooth removal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The parents of Jenny Olenick, 17, who died during wisdom tooth removal surgery last April have sued the oral surgeon and anesthesiologist who performed the procedure for medical malpractice, according to <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/parents-sue-teen-dies-during-wisdom-tooth-surgery-143224302.html" class="liexternal">Yahoo News</a>. Olenick, then a high school junior in Maryland, died from complications that arose during the routine outpatient procedure.</p> <p>The parents filed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/16/parents-sue-after-child-dies-during-wisdom-tooth-surgery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Four Years of Jail for Doctor Conrad Murray</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/29/four-years-of-jail-for-doctor-conrad-murray/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/29/four-years-of-jail-for-doctor-conrad-murray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Blanchard, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conrad-murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[involuntary manslaughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michale Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray sentencing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Doctor Conrad Murray was <a href="http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45468611/ns/today-entertainment/#.TtUtOmOGMmB" title="Conrad Murray sentenced article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">given the maximum sentence</a> of four years in prison today. He was <a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/07/doctor-conrad-murray-guilty-in-jackson-trial/" title="Murray Guitly - lawinfo blog" target="_blank" class="liinternal">convicted of involuntary manslaughter</a> earlier this month in the overdose death of Michael Jackson. While Murray has stated that he “didn’t consider himself guilty [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/29/four-years-of-jail-for-doctor-conrad-murray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia Supreme Court Strikes Collection of Child Support Due to Statute of Limitations</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/14/virginia-supreme-court-strikes-collection-of-child-support-due-to-statute-of-limitations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/14/virginia-supreme-court-strikes-collection-of-child-support-due-to-statute-of-limitations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arrears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child-support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt collection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statute of limitations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>20 year Statute of Limitation Eliminates Chance at Collecting Stale Child Support Arrears</p> <p>Parents of the world take note, the dreaded legal doctrine of Statute of Limitations (SOL) applies even to child support. A <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/10/41367.htm" title="Child Support Statute of Limitations" target="_blank" class="liexternal">Virginia woman</a> sued to enforce the collection of a child support order entered [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/14/virginia-supreme-court-strikes-collection-of-child-support-due-to-statute-of-limitations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Role Playing Games, Cheat and Be Sued</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/11/in-role-playing-games-cheat-and-be-sued/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/11/in-role-playing-games-cheat-and-be-sued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright infringement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subpoena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Jagex, a company that created an online fantasy role-playing game (Runescape), was granted the ability to <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/11/10/41380.htm" title="Runescape suit" target="_blank" class="liexternal">subpoena </a>the personal information of cheating players, even though the same information is under seal in a related case in Massachusetts.</p> <p>The suit is based on the fact that the players (being sued) use &#8220;bot&#8221; software [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/11/in-role-playing-games-cheat-and-be-sued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imprisoned Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Faces $18.3+ Million Suit</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/08/imprisoned-former-ukrainian-prime-minister-faces-18-3-million-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/08/imprisoned-former-ukrainian-prime-minister-faces-18-3-million-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 17:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[default judgment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racketeering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[treble damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ukrainian legal news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yulia Tymoshenko Faces $18.3+ Million  Lawsuit</p> <p>The former Ukrainian Prime Minister, Yulia Tymoshenko, who was recently imprisoned on corruption charges, is facing a suit seeking enforcement of a $18.3 mllion dollar U.S. verdict, in addition to treble damages, on a variety of charges, including conversion, unjust enrichment, RICO conspiracy, and fraudulent conveyance, all relating to her involvement with a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/08/imprisoned-former-ukrainian-prime-minister-faces-18-3-million-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Doctor Conrad Murray GUILTY in Jackson Trial</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/07/doctor-conrad-murray-guilty-in-jackson-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/07/doctor-conrad-murray-guilty-in-jackson-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 21:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Blankinship, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Malpractice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dr. conrad murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guilty-verdict]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[involuntary manslaughter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael jackson trial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Doctor Conrad Murray has been found guilty for the involuntary manslaughter of Michael Jackson. Under CA Penal Code 192(b), a person is guilty of involuntary manslaughter when the killing is performed:</p> <p style="padding-left: 30px;">&#8220;in the commission of an unlawful act, not amounting to felony; or in the commission of a lawful act which might produce [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/07/doctor-conrad-murray-guilty-in-jackson-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

