<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawinfo Weblog &#187; Legal Trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/category/legal-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com</link>
	<description>Lawyer Blog &#124; Attorney Blog &#124; Read and Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions: Class Actions</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/27/frequently-asked-questions-class-actions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/27/frequently-asked-questions-class-actions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmful products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Frequently Asked Questions: Class Actions</p> <p>Class actions are something that we hear a lot about in the news, but they aren&#8217;t usually explained in detail. For example, what does it mean that someone is filing a class action? In general, a <a href="http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Class-Action/Federal/what-is-a-class-action-lawsuit.html" title="what is a class action" target="_blank" class="liexternal">class action</a> is a lawsuit that is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/27/frequently-asked-questions-class-actions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Current Event: Illinois City Considers Ban on Eating While Driving</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/10/17/legal-current-event-illinois-city-considers-ban-on-eating-while-driving/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/10/17/legal-current-event-illinois-city-considers-ban-on-eating-while-driving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distracted driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eating while driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highway-safety-]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois driving laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oak Park laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=12305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Insurance companies have made a push in recent months to attract new customers by depicting the many types of distracted driving: blaring music, makeup application, hot coffee, etc. Oak Park, Illinois, is now <a href="http://www.wgntv.com/news/wgntv-oak-park-eating-driving-ban-oct13,0,837345.story?hpt=us_bn6" title="Oak Park Article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">considering </a>a ban on eating, drinking and grooming behind the wheel. The purported purpose of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/10/17/legal-current-event-illinois-city-considers-ban-on-eating-while-driving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot Topics: Stock Broker Fraud</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/09/19/hot-topics-stock-broker-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/09/19/hot-topics-stock-broker-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 17:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Corporate & Securities Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock broker fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock fraud attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall street fraud]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=12035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Stock Broker Fraud: What is it?</p> <p><a href="http://lawsuits.lawinfo.com/StockBrokerFraud/index.html" title="Stock Broker Fraud" target="_blank" class="liexternal">Stock broker fraud</a>, also referred to as investment fraud, happens when a financial professional, such as an advisor, stock broker,  or brokerage firm offers the investor information that is misleading due to inaccuracy, incompleteness or bias, which is designed to benefit the person [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/09/19/hot-topics-stock-broker-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Media Contact With Students – Is It Ok?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/26/social-media-contact-with-students-%e2%80%93-is-it-ok/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/26/social-media-contact-with-students-%e2%80%93-is-it-ok/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 22:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Blanchard, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inappropriate student/teacher communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media contact with students]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers and students on facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teachers and students on twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/iStock_000016857623XSmall.jpg" class="liimagelink"></a>I used to teach middle school in a small town so I understand the struggle of having a personal life but keeping it private from my students. Eating out at restaurants often included seeing a student or two. I viewed my role as an educator, not a friend so I made sure to not blur the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/26/social-media-contact-with-students-%e2%80%93-is-it-ok/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Three Strikes Law Means Potential Life in Prison: Time for Reform?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/04/california-three-strikes-law-means-potential-life-in-prison-time-for-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/04/california-three-strikes-law-means-potential-life-in-prison-time-for-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Blanchard, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prisons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Trebek Burlarized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life in Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three Strikes Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three Strikes Rule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The California Three Strikes law has been in the press a lot lately. Many people have heard about Lucinda Moyers, the woman facing a <a href="http://www.hot1047.com/hollywood-dirt/46149-alex-trebek-intruder-faces-25-to" title="Three Stikes Alex Trebek Story" target="_blank" class="liexternal">potential life sentence</a> after being arrested for allegedly breaking into Alex Trebek’s hotel room.<a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/iStock_000000598061XSmall.jpg" class="liimagelink"></a></p> <p>Moyers is 56, has two prior felonies, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/04/california-three-strikes-law-means-potential-life-in-prison-time-for-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game Changer: Federal Circuit Rules Isolated Human DNA Patentable</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/04/game-changer-federal-circuit-rules-isolated-human-dna-patentable/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/04/game-changer-federal-circuit-rules-isolated-human-dna-patentable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brca 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brca1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human dna now patentable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isolated DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Circuit Appeals Court, a special court for hearing Intellectual Property cases, <a href="http://www.timeswireservice.com/news/Gene_patent_judgment__isolated_DNAs_can_be_patented_1312036101/" title="Federal Circuit Rules DNA Patentable" target="_blank" class="liexternal">ruled </a>that isolated human DNA genes can be patented. This ruling, assuming that it is upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, which somewhat defers to the Federal Circuit for its special expertise in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/04/game-changer-federal-circuit-rules-isolated-human-dna-patentable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trending Topic: Lady Gaga’s YouTube Account Suspended</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/18/trending-topic-lady-gaga%e2%80%99s-youtube-account-suspended/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/18/trending-topic-lady-gaga%e2%80%99s-youtube-account-suspended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lady Gaga’s Loses YouTube Account <p>Lady Gaga is at the center of controversy, but not for her over-the-top fashion choices, theatrical makeup or sculpture-like hairstyles. <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/07/14/entertainment/e133721D65.DTL" class="liexternal">Reportedly</a>, ladygagaofficial, Gaga’s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/" target="_blank" class="liexternal">YouTube</a> account was suspended after it posted a 10 minute clip from one of Gaga’s performances which recently aired on a Japanese [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/18/trending-topic-lady-gaga%e2%80%99s-youtube-account-suspended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Same-Sex Marriage Now Legal In New York?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/25/is-same-sex-marriage-now-legal-in-new-york/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/25/is-same-sex-marriage-now-legal-in-new-york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 03:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sweet, Esq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exception to gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legality of gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ny gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ny same sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=10860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Those in favor of same-sex marriage may have another victory under their belt.  Late Friday, June 25, 2011, the <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2011/06/25/same-sex-marriage-and-the-empire-state-a-legal-roundup/" class="liexternal">New York Senate voted</a> to legalize same-sex marriage in a 33-29 vote.  The vote in favor of same-sex marriage was a bit of a shock to some since the New York Senate is led [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/25/is-same-sex-marriage-now-legal-in-new-york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Lawyers Hire Actors?  One Company Says Yes</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/03/04/do-lawyers-hire-actors-one-company-says-yes/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/03/04/do-lawyers-hire-actors-one-company-says-yes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 17:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sweet, Esq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actors in court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[how to win at trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[using actors to read depositions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[what is a deposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[win court case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winning court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=9336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Generally lawyers aren’t actors, some may be temperamental, others may fancy themselves as an A-list attorney, but generally attorneys don’t have much in the way of theatrical training.  It’s been said a jury trial is just one big dog-and-pony show, and those at <a href="http://www.actorsatlaw.com/index.html" target="_blank" class="liexternal">Actors-at-law, Inc.</a> would surely agree.</p> <p><a href="http://www.actorsatlaw.com/index.html" target="_blank" class="liexternal">Actors-at-law, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/03/04/do-lawyers-hire-actors-one-company-says-yes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OMS Marketing Summit, Top 3 Rules for Attorney Marketing</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/02/17/oms-marketing-summit-top-3-rules-for-attorney-marketing/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/02/17/oms-marketing-summit-top-3-rules-for-attorney-marketing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 23:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sweet, Esq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMS marketing summit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=9158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>San Diego was abuzz last week with all the latest trends in Online Marketing and Social Media.  The Online Marketing Summit came to the city bringing brand new ideas, and fresh takes on dated but effective marketing avenues.</p> <p>Attorneys are always looking for effective ways to advertise their practice and showcase their area of expertise [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/02/17/oms-marketing-summit-top-3-rules-for-attorney-marketing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

