<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawinfo Weblog &#187; Intellectual Property</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/category/intellectual-property/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com</link>
	<description>Lawyer Blog &#124; Attorney Blog &#124; Read and Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:31:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are You Buying Counterfeit Goods?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/13/are-you-buying-counterfeit-goods/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/13/are-you-buying-counterfeit-goods/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Blankinship, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying fake products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous-products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake purses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The appeal of buying counterfeit goods is undeniable. They mimic pricier items at a fraction of the cost and are relatively easy to find and purchase. The market is so great for these items that according to <a href="http://money.msn.com/family-money/7-ordinary-items-now-counterfeited" title="7 ordinary items now counterfeited" target="_blank" class="liexternal">MSN</a>, &#8220;By 2015&#8230; the value of fake goods on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/13/are-you-buying-counterfeit-goods/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Legal Event: Huggies Patent Infringement Case Will Proceed to Trial</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/06/current-legal-event-huggies-patent-infringement-case-will-proceed-to-trial/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/06/current-legal-event-huggies-patent-infringement-case-will-proceed-to-trial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diaper patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first quality brand diapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huggies diaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huggies lawsuit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Diaper Battle: Generic v. Name Brand</p> <p>A judge spent time analyzing the differences between two different diapers in order to determine whether one infringed the patent(s) held by the other.  The parties are litigating over whether First Quality, a bargain type manufacturer of diapers, infringed Kimberly-Clark (makers of Huggies)&#8217;s patents, with the use of elastic [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/06/current-legal-event-huggies-patent-infringement-case-will-proceed-to-trial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pornography is not Copyrightable, Complaint Alleges</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/06/pornography-is-not-copyrightable-complaint-alleges/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/06/pornography-is-not-copyrightable-complaint-alleges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obscene material]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In an interesting turn of events, a woman sued for copyright infringement, from <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/03/43613.htm" title="porno article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">allegedly</a> illegally downloading a pornographic movie, is <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/02/03/HardDrive2.pdf" title="copyright complaint" target="_blank" class="lipdf">suing</a> the owner of the movie&#8217;s rights, demanding relief from the prior lawsuit, claiming the material was not copyrightable in the first place.</p> <p><a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/iStock_000013195362XSmall.jpg" class="liimagelink"></a>According to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/06/pornography-is-not-copyrightable-complaint-alleges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forever 21 Sued for Copyright Infringement</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/22/forever-21-sued-for-copyright-infringement/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/22/forever-21-sued-for-copyright-infringement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 15:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[useful articles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Current Forever 21 Lawsuits</p> <p>Forever 21 is being <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/08/15/forever-21-angers-indie-designers-attracts-shoppers/" title="Forever 21 Article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">sued </a>by an independent fashion designer for copyright infringement.</p> <p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_05/b4213090559511_page_3.htm" title="Forever 21 background" class="liexternal">Forever 21</a> is famous for carrying large inventory of currently popular clothing.</p> <p>Feral Childe claims claims the ready-to-wear giant essentially stole one of its hand-drawn &#8220;teepee&#8221; designs, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/22/forever-21-sued-for-copyright-infringement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game Changer: Federal Circuit Rules Isolated Human DNA Patentable</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/04/game-changer-federal-circuit-rules-isolated-human-dna-patentable/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/04/game-changer-federal-circuit-rules-isolated-human-dna-patentable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 19:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brca 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brca1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal-circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human dna now patentable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isolated DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Federal Circuit Appeals Court, a special court for hearing Intellectual Property cases, <a href="http://www.timeswireservice.com/news/Gene_patent_judgment__isolated_DNAs_can_be_patented_1312036101/" title="Federal Circuit Rules DNA Patentable" target="_blank" class="liexternal">ruled </a>that isolated human DNA genes can be patented. This ruling, assuming that it is upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court, which somewhat defers to the Federal Circuit for its special expertise in the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/08/04/game-changer-federal-circuit-rules-isolated-human-dna-patentable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LawSmart.com Doc Spotlight: Free Estate Planning Documents at Your Fingertips</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/22/lawsmart-com-doc-spotlight-free-estate-planning-documents-at-your-fingertips/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/22/lawsmart-com-doc-spotlight-free-estate-planning-documents-at-your-fingertips/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Estate Planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Landlord - Tenant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LawSmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[estate planning documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free legal documents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free legal forms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free will]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property documents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.lawsmart.com/" title="LawSmart" target="_blank" class="liexternal">LawSmart.com</a> Offers Free Legal Documents <p><a href="http://www.lawsmart.com/" title="LawSmart" target="_blank" class="liexternal">LawSmart.com</a> is a new website that offers users the ability to create high quality legal documents for free. Although <a href="http://www.lawsmart.com/" class="liexternal">LawSmart</a> is still technically in Beta, the legal documents that have been uploaded are attorney written for each specific jurisdiction/state.</p> <p>LawSmart [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/22/lawsmart-com-doc-spotlight-free-estate-planning-documents-at-your-fingertips/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trending Topic: Lady Gaga’s YouTube Account Suspended</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/18/trending-topic-lady-gaga%e2%80%99s-youtube-account-suspended/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/18/trending-topic-lady-gaga%e2%80%99s-youtube-account-suspended/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intellectual property attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lead counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popular music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=11072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lady Gaga’s Loses YouTube Account <p>Lady Gaga is at the center of controversy, but not for her over-the-top fashion choices, theatrical makeup or sculpture-like hairstyles. <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2011/07/14/entertainment/e133721D65.DTL" class="liexternal">Reportedly</a>, ladygagaofficial, Gaga’s <a href="http://www.youtube.com/" target="_blank" class="liexternal">YouTube</a> account was suspended after it posted a 10 minute clip from one of Gaga’s performances which recently aired on a Japanese [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/07/18/trending-topic-lady-gaga%e2%80%99s-youtube-account-suspended/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Patent Reform Passed By Legislature</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/24/new-patent-reform-passed-by-legislature/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/24/new-patent-reform-passed-by-legislature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 02:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sweet, Esq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america invents act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new patent law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent bill passed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=10850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>You’ve invented the next big thing; you want your millions upon millions of dollars and world-wide fame.  The question – how do you protect your invention?  In many cases, this means that you will apply for a patent.</p> What Is A Patent? <p>A patent protects unique designs, processes or new ideas.  They must fill out [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/06/24/new-patent-reform-passed-by-legislature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is It Fair To Jail Those Who Buy A Fake Purse?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/05/01/is-it-fair-to-jail-those-who-buy-a-fake-purse/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/05/01/is-it-fair-to-jail-those-who-buy-a-fake-purse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2011 18:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sweet, Esq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[buying fake bag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterfeit goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jail for buying fake bag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knockoffs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[why are counterfeit bags illegal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=10058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>New York City has almost anything you could want; delicious food, amazing arts, and….knockoff handbags?  For those of us who have lived in a big city, there is usually a place in town where fake Gucci or Louis Vutton bags are sold.  Creating and selling these fake items are not only morally wrong, but are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/05/01/is-it-fair-to-jail-those-who-buy-a-fake-purse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Owns The &#8220;Novel&#8221; Bratz Doll Name?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/04/21/who-owns-the-novel-bratz-doll-name/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/04/21/who-owns-the-novel-bratz-doll-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 06:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sweet, Esq</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bratz doll lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bratz doll patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[novelty patent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[required to get patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=9956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Surprisingly, one of the more highly contested lawsuits of the last few years has been that of Mattel (the creator of Barbie) and MGA Entertainment over who owns the right to the Bratz doll line.  The complicating issue in this intellectual property case?  The man who created the Bratz doll, Carter Bryant, was a former [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/04/21/who-owns-the-novel-bratz-doll-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

