<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawinfo Weblog &#187; Constitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/category/constitutional/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com</link>
	<description>Lawyer Blog &#124; Attorney Blog &#124; Read and Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Legislature Approves Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/washington-legislature-approves-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/washington-legislature-approves-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current legal events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new state laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state-laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This Wednesday, the Washington State House of Representatives <a href="http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/news/2012/02/08/washington-house-votes-to-legalize.html" title="WA gay marriage article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">passed</a> a gay marriage bill, that had already passed in the Senate, by a vote of 55-43. Governor Chis Gregoire is expected to sign it into law within five days. The<br /> outcome of the vote was allegedly uncertain due to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/09/washington-legislature-approves-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Father Shoots Son over Country Music</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/03/father-shoots-son-over-country-music/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/03/father-shoots-son-over-country-music/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Blanchard, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[father shoots sone over karaoke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karaoke shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right to bear arms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shot for singing country music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am no fan of country music, but I never felt the need to shoot someone over it, but it appears that someone did feel that need. Last week William Henry Oller, Sr., 70,<a href="http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/1124272--i-m-going-to-shut-you-up-father-shoots-son-after-karaoke-singing-turns-ugly" title="Father allegedly shoots son article" target="_blank" class="liexternal"> allegedly shot his son </a>William Carr Oller Jr., 50, over his son’s karaoke [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/03/father-shoots-son-over-country-music/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Violent Occupy Oakland Demonstrations and Attempted Take Over Result in 400 Arrests</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/30/violent-occupy-oakland-demonstrations-and-attempted-take-over-result-in-400-arrests/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/30/violent-occupy-oakland-demonstrations-and-attempted-take-over-result-in-400-arrests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current legal events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right of assembly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Occupy Oakland Attacks City, Embraces Violent Tactics</p> <p>Over the weekend, Occupy Oakland protestors <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-occupy-oakland-20120130,0,6365053.story?track=rss&#38;utm_source=feedburner&#38;utm_medium=feed&#38;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+latimes%2Fnews%2Flocal+%28L.A.+Times+-+California+%7C+Local+News%29&#38;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher" title="occupy oakland article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">attempted</a> a takeover of a vacant building, which they planned to repurpose as a &#8221;social center, convergence center and headquarters of the Occupy Oakland movement.&#8221; Some time after the attempted takeover, protestors also broke into City Hall, smashed display [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/30/violent-occupy-oakland-demonstrations-and-attempted-take-over-result-in-400-arrests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Masterminds: Current U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Stephen Breyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/19/legal-masterminds-current-u-s-supreme-court-justices-stephen-breyer/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/19/legal-masterminds-current-u-s-supreme-court-justices-stephen-breyer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current U.S. Supreme Court Justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice Stephen Breyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Masterminds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Legal Masterminds: Current U.S. Supreme Court Justices</p> <p>This post is the fifth in a <a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/15/legal-masterminds-current-u-s-supreme-court-justices-ruth-bader-ginsburg/" title="Ginsburg post" target="_blank" class="liinternal">series</a> of posts about the current U.S. Supreme Court Justices.</p> <p>Stephen G. Breyer was appointed to the Court by President Bill Clinton in 1994. Although he clerked for a Supreme Court Justice, Arthur Goldberg in 1964, he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/19/legal-masterminds-current-u-s-supreme-court-justices-stephen-breyer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird Law of the Day: Oklahoma&#8217;s Save Our State Amendment</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/13/weird-law-of-the-day-oklahomas-save-our-state-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/13/weird-law-of-the-day-oklahomas-save-our-state-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dumb or Weird Laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb or weird laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Establishment Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Voters in Oklahoma passed a constitutional amendment in 2010, called the Save Our State Amendment, which would prohibit Oklahoma courts from looking to international or Sharia Law in reaching its decisions.<a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Sharia-Law-Oklahoma.jpg" class="liimagelink"></a></p> <p>Eventhough the amendment was initially passed in 2010, it has been in the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57356451/court-okla-ban-on-islamic-law-unconstitutional/" title="SOS Article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">news</a> lately because The U.S. [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/13/weird-law-of-the-day-oklahomas-save-our-state-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Legal Event: Mom Sues TSA Over Breast Milk Screening Harassment</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/19/current-legal-event-mom-sues-tsa-over-breast-milk-screening-harassment/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/19/current-legal-event-mom-sues-tsa-over-breast-milk-screening-harassment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:16:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airport security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Tort Claims Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mother Sues over TSA Agents&#8217; Refusal of Alternate Breast Milk Screening &#38; Harassment</p> <p>A mother is <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/16/BreastMilk.pdf" title="Breastmilk suit" target="_blank" class="lipdf">suing </a>the Transportation Security Administration and its agents in the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport for the humiliation and detention she faced for requesting the alternate screening process for breast milk.</p> <p>Essentially, Stacey Armato, the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/19/current-legal-event-mom-sues-tsa-over-breast-milk-screening-harassment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Masterminds: Current U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Ruth Bader Ginsburg</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/15/legal-masterminds-current-u-s-supreme-court-justices-ruth-bader-ginsburg/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/15/legal-masterminds-current-u-s-supreme-court-justices-ruth-bader-ginsburg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 17:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current U.S. Supreme Court Justices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Legal Masterminds: Current U.S. Supreme Court Justices</p> <p>This is the <a href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/10/legal-masterminds-current-u-s-supreme-court-justices-clarence-thomas/" title="Thomas post" target="_blank" class="liinternal">fourth</a> in a series on current U.S. Supreme Court justices.</p> <p>Ruth Bader Ginsburg was appointed by President Bill Clinton in 1993. She was the second female justice, and the first Jewish female justice ever appointed to the high court. Although she [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/15/legal-masterminds-current-u-s-supreme-court-justices-ruth-bader-ginsburg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a Tattoo Prevent You From Getting the Job?</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/14/can-a-tattoo-prevent-you-from-getting-the-job/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/14/can-a-tattoo-prevent-you-from-getting-the-job/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Plaintiff in Employment Suit Loses over Tattoo</p> <p>A Pennsylvania U.S. District Court judge says <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/13/TattooOpinion.pdf" title="Face Tattoo Case" target="_blank" class="lipdf">yes</a>.</p> <p>Ronald Scavone sued Pennsylvania State Police (PSP), because it would not hire him as a Liquor Enforcement Officer because of a tattoo.  While he met all the requirements, Scavone&#8217;s job was made conditional on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/14/can-a-tattoo-prevent-you-from-getting-the-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Will Decide Constitutionality of Arizona Immigration Law</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/13/supreme-court-will-decide-constitutionality-of-arizona-immigration-law/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/13/supreme-court-will-decide-constitutionality-of-arizona-immigration-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 16:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arizona immigration law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal immigration laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state immigration laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme-court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/121211zor.pdf" title="Arizona Immigration Law" target="_blank" class="lipdf">decided</a> this week that it will hear the challenge to the Arizona Immigration Law, recently held unconstitutional by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.</p> <p>The national government sued to enjoin the law from taking effect. Because illegal immigration is generally considered a federal issue, the national government [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/13/supreme-court-will-decide-constitutionality-of-arizona-immigration-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/01/landmark-supreme-court-cases-village-of-euclid-v-ambler-realty-co/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/01/landmark-supreme-court-cases-village-of-euclid-v-ambler-realty-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[just compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landmark cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takings clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U.S. 265 (1926) <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0272_0365_ZS.html" title="Euclid v. Ambler" target="_blank" class="liexternal">Euclid v. Ambler</a>, was a landmark decision in the area of zoning. It dealt with the city of Euclid, which enacted various zoning regulations, in order to keep certain areas of the city within [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/01/landmark-supreme-court-cases-village-of-euclid-v-ambler-realty-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

