<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawinfo Weblog &#187; Class Actions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.lawinfo.com/category/class-actions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com</link>
	<description>Lawyer Blog &#124; Attorney Blog &#124; Read and Post</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>12 Law Schools Added To Student Class Action Suit</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/12-law-schools-added-to-student-class-action-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/12-law-schools-added-to-student-class-action-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Witzmann</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defrauding employment data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[falsifying employment data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law school class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tier three law school]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=16070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Prospective law students look at a multitude of factors before deciding which school to attend. Some of these factors include prestige, scholarships, location, quality of professors etc. However, the most important statistic for most law students is the percentage of graduates that are employed soon. Thus, these students expect that the school&#8217;s published graduate employment [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/02/07/12-law-schools-added-to-student-class-action-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Newborn DNA Collection Class Action</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/20/minnesota-newborn-dna-collection-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/20/minnesota-newborn-dna-collection-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newborn baby testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Minnesota Newborn Screening Program Keeps Minors&#8217; DNA for Testing, Etc. </p> <p>A class action comprised of parents of newborns in Minnesota is <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/19/43164.htm" title="Minnesota DNA Class Action" target="_blank" class="liexternal">suing</a> the state, its Department of Health, and its commissioner, claiming that they have violated the state&#8217;s Genetic Privacy Act, which took effect in 2006. The Act was [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/20/minnesota-newborn-dna-collection-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Legal Event: Woman Files Class Action Over Avis&#8217; Car Rental&#8217;s Gay Discount</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/12/current-legal-event-woman-files-class-action-over-avis-car-rentals-gay-discount/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/12/current-legal-event-woman-files-class-action-over-avis-car-rentals-gay-discount/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 16:49:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avis class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[avis gay discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discount for gay drivers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Avis Class Action Lawsuit</p> <p>Lynn Evenchik of Pima County, Arizona is <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/01/11/42944.htm" title="Avis class action" target="_blank" class="liexternal">suing</a> Avis rental cars for allegedly violating her civil rights by not granting her a discount on her car rental due to her sexual orientation. More specifically, she is challenging the business deal entered into by Avis and the Gay [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2012/01/12/current-legal-event-woman-files-class-action-over-avis-car-rentals-gay-discount/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frequently Asked Questions: Class Actions</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/27/frequently-asked-questions-class-actions/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/27/frequently-asked-questions-class-actions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consumer goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmful products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Frequently Asked Questions: Class Actions</p> <p>Class actions are something that we hear a lot about in the news, but they aren&#8217;t usually explained in detail. For example, what does it mean that someone is filing a class action? In general, a <a href="http://resources.lawinfo.com/en/Legal-FAQs/Class-Action/Federal/what-is-a-class-action-lawsuit.html" title="what is a class action" target="_blank" class="liexternal">class action</a> is a lawsuit that is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/27/frequently-asked-questions-class-actions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Legal Event: Breast Implant Class Action Planned Amid Cancer Concerns</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/22/current-legal-event-breast-implant-class-action-planned-amid-cancer-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/22/current-legal-event-breast-implant-class-action-planned-amid-cancer-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous Products / Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breast implant class action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class-action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous or defective products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A group consisting of at least 250 women in the United Kingdom is planning legal action due to fears that their breast implants may be linked to increased cancer risks. The implants in question, Poly Implant Prostheses (PIP), were manufactured by a French company, now shut down.</p> <p>The women plan to sue the clinics that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/22/current-legal-event-breast-implant-class-action-planned-amid-cancer-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>StubHub Faces $5 Million Class Action Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/21/stubhub-faces-5-million-class-action-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/21/stubhub-faces-5-million-class-action-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 16:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A New Jersey man, Joseph Fabozzi, <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/20/StubHub.pdf" title="Stub Hub Complaint" target="_blank" class="lipdf">filed </a>a $5 million class action lawsuit against the online ticket trader website, after he was denied admission to a Stone Temple Pilots concert due to a duplicate ticket.</p> <p>His complaint states that, &#8221;[e]ven though StubHub makes numerous &#8216;guarantees&#8217; on its website that a ticket [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/12/21/stubhub-faces-5-million-class-action-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot Topic: Environmental Law</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/28/hot-topic-environmental-law/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/28/hot-topic-environmental-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carcinogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action law suits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesothelioma asbestos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water pollution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Plaintiff Environmental Law Movies: Erin Brokovich</p> <p>Over the Thanksgiving weekend, I happened to come across a showing of Erin Brokovich. I personally can&#8217;t resist a movie detailing a plaintiff&#8217;s story, no matter how many times I&#8217;ve seen it, especially when it involves corporate misdeeds. Additionally, water law issues are particularly near to my heart. I&#8217;m [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/28/hot-topic-environmental-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA Advisory Panel Discussed Potential Dangers of Topamax Side Effects</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/09/fda-advisory-panel-discussed-potential-dangers-of-topamax-side-effects/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/09/fda-advisory-panel-discussed-potential-dangers-of-topamax-side-effects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shannon Blanchard, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fda advisory committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax lawyers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topamax side effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The FDA is <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/10/26/prweb8875426.DTL" title="Topamax Article" target="_blank" class="liexternal">researching </a>whether or not the drug Topamax’s benefits outweigh the risks of side effects connected to the drug. An FDA Advisory Panel met on September 23, 2011 to review the results of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS). The REMS was approved in March of 2011 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/09/fda-advisory-panel-discussed-potential-dangers-of-topamax-side-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal Hot Topic: DePuy Hip Replacement</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/07/legal-hot-topic-depuy-hip-replacement/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/07/legal-hot-topic-depuy-hip-replacement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dangerous Products / Defective Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class action lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dangerous or defective products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depuy hip replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faulty hip replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA recalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hip recall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>LawInfo is Your Source for DePuy Hip Replacement Information</p> <p>Approximately 93,000 people received a DePuy Hip Replacement after July 2003, which is now subject to an FDA recall.  Many patients who received a DePuy ASR Hip Replacement and the DePuy XL Acetabular ASR are now filing lawsuits against DePuy and others due to the  high early [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/11/07/legal-hot-topic-depuy-hip-replacement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Current Legal Event: AT&amp;T Class Action Avoids Courtroom, for Now</title>
		<link>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/10/31/current-legal-event-att-class-action-avoids-courtroom-for-now/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/10/31/current-legal-event-att-class-action-avoids-courtroom-for-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Class Actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lead Counsel Corner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T data charges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class actions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overbilled at&t]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.lawinfo.com/?p=15081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Unhappy iPhone and iPad Users Must Submit to Arbitration over Excessive Data Charge Claims</p> <p>A <a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/10/28/41037.htm" title="AT&#38;T Class Action" target="_blank" class="liexternal">new</a> class action filed against AT&#38;T Mobility will stay out of court, for now. The case, filed on behalf of iPhone and iPad users, who are alleging AT&#38;T overbilled them for data use, perhaps by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.lawinfo.com/2011/10/31/current-legal-event-att-class-action-avoids-courtroom-for-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

