Do you ever find yourself captivated by a prescription drug commercial, thinking that the subject drug is just the “cure” you’ve been looking for to aid your ailment? Then all of a sudden in extremely small script at the bottom of the screen accompanied by a fast-talking auctioneer-like gentleman, you learn of the potential side effects; most of which seem worse than your initial problem to begin with?
In the past few years, an influx of both individual and class action law suits have been filed by patients that took various prescription drugs that had devastating side effects. Pradaxa is among one of the many medications that has sparked such litigation.
What is Pradaxa?
Pradaxa is a blood thinning medication prescribed to prevent clotting. It was approved and commonly prescribed to patients with atrial fibrillation (irregular heart beat) as a means of stroke prevention. Pradaxa was meant to replace Coumadin or Warfarin, and marketed as a drug that would be easier for patients to use because it required less monitoring by a doctor.
Problems with Pradaxa
Soon after Pradaxa hit the market alleged side effects of uncontrollable bleeding problems were reported. Thousands of reports began to surface where doctors were unable to control patient bleeding, oftentimes resulting in death; hundreds throughout the United States to date. The previous drug, Warfarin (on the market since the 1950s) had a reversal agent, the proverbial antidote to control bleeding; Pradaxa however has no such fix available, resulting in helplessness on behalf of physicians nationwide.
Legal Claims Against Pradaxa
The numerous cases filed nationwide allege that consumption of the drug has caused patients to suffer severe gastrointestinal bleed resulting in hospitalization. Claims have been asserted for strict liability based on failure to warn and design defect, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, breach of express warranty, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, negligence per se, fraudulent concealment, and violation of consumer protections laws.
The first of such lawsuits is scheduled to be heard in late 2014. The federal courts have begun consolidating the “Pradaxa Litigation” into a Multi-District lawsuit. Approximately 200 plaintiffs are enrolled in this particular action with a number of other lawsuits pending nationwide.
-
ken smith1st
-
Benghazi Partyboy
-
Colin watson
-
Michael Todd
Recommended Attorneys
Find Posts
Popular Posts
Topics
Administrative Law
Adoption
Animal Law
Attorney Spotlight
Bankruptcy – Business
Bankruptcy – Personal
Business Law
Civil Appellate
Civil Litigation
Civil Rights
Consumer Protection
Copyright
Criminal Law – Appellate
Criminal Law – Federal
Criminal Law – State Felony & Misdemeanor
Divorce
Drunk Driving Defense
Dumb or Weird Laws
En Español
Entertainment Law
Animal Law
Environmental Law
Estate Planning
Family Law
General
Hot Topics
2012 Meningitis Outbreak
Actos
Biomet Hip Replacement
Celebrex
Fosamax
Granuflo
Mirena
NaturaLyte
NuvaRing
Paxil
Pradaxa
Propecia
Smith & Nephew Hip Replacement
Stryker Hip Replacement
Vaginal Mesh
Wright Hip Replacement
Yaz/Yasmin
Zoloft
Immigration Law
Intellectual Property Law
International Law
Juvenile Law
Labor & Employment Law
Landlord Tenant Law
Legal Malpractice
Lemon Law
Maritime Law
Medical Malpractice
Military Law
Personal Injury – Defendant
Personal Injury – Plaintiff
Real Property
Securities
Social Security Disability
Tax Law
Workers' Compensation
Facebook Fans








