New York Police Stop Individuals Without Suspicion of Criminal Activity Under “Operation Clean Halls”
The New York City Department started an “Operation Clean Halls” program “aimed at preventing illegal activity at buildings in high-crime areas.” However, instead of applying the constitutional restrictions of “stop and frisk” laws, the New York police apparently regularly stopped individuals outside the buildings without “reasonable suspicion” that they were involved in criminal activity.
U.S. District Judge Shira Scheindlin claims that plaintiffs against the New York City Department’s stop and frisk program “had shown a clear likelihood of proving the city had shown deliberate indifference toward a widespread practice of unconstitutional trespass stops by police outside the buildings.” According to the NYtimes, “officers were routinely stopping people outside the buildings without reasonable suspicion that they were trespassing.”
Remedial Proposals By U.S. District Judge
Judge Scheindlin ordered the following remedial proposals to “Operation Clean Halls”:
- The New York City Police Department shall “develop and adopt a written policy describing limited circumstances when a person on a suspicion of trespass can be stopped.”
- The New York City Police Department shall “revise officers training materials.”
- The New York City Police Department shall “alter some of the training literature and videos used to teach officers how to conduct lawful stops.”
What are the Constitutional Limitations to Stop & Frisk?
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), is a Landmark Supreme Court case, which decided the constitutionality of a “Stop & Frisk.” Under the ruling, a police officer may stop a person without “probable cause” for arrest if the police officer has “reasonable suspicion” that the defendant is engaging in criminal activity. Furthermore, if the officer reasonably believes that the defendant is armed and dangerous, they may conduct a protective frisk.
What do you think? Should police officers be able to stop an individual who merely enters or exits a building without acting suspiciously?
Comments are closed.
Recommended Attorneys
Find Posts
Popular Posts
Topics
Administrative Law
Adoption
Animal Law
Attorney Spotlight
Bankruptcy – Business
Bankruptcy – Personal
Business Law
Civil Appellate
Civil Litigation
Civil Rights
Consumer Protection
Copyright
Criminal Law – Appellate
Criminal Law – Federal
Criminal Law – State Felony & Misdemeanor
Divorce
Drunk Driving Defense
Dumb or Weird Laws
En Español
Entertainment Law
Animal Law
Environmental Law
Estate Planning
Family Law
General
Hot Topics
2012 Meningitis Outbreak
Actos
Biomet Hip Replacement
Celebrex
Fosamax
Granuflo
Mirena
NaturaLyte
NuvaRing
Paxil
Pradaxa
Propecia
Smith & Nephew Hip Replacement
Stryker Hip Replacement
Vaginal Mesh
Wright Hip Replacement
Yaz/Yasmin
Zoloft
Immigration Law
Intellectual Property Law
International Law
Juvenile Law
Labor & Employment Law
Landlord Tenant Law
Legal Malpractice
Lemon Law
Maritime Law
Medical Malpractice
Military Law
Personal Injury – Defendant
Personal Injury – Plaintiff
Real Property
Securities
Social Security Disability
Tax Law
Workers' Compensation
Facebook Fans









