The FDA has received several adverse reports about the Wright Hip Replacement implant products. Therefore, I want to inform the readers of this blog about the dangers associated with the implant and how they can seek proper representation and care.
What are Wright Hip Replacement Implants?
The Wright Hip Replacement Implants are artificial hip implant devices that replace a patient’s damaged hip joint with a synthetic ball and a corresponding cup. Both the ball and the cup have a metal on metal connection.
Why Are Wright Hip Replacement Implants Dangerous?
The problem associated with the Wright Hip Replacement Implant is its durability. According to reports, the implant may fracture or break. This can be very painful for the patient. Moreover, when the ball and the cup rub against each other, the metal-on-metal connection of the implant may cause metallosis.
Wright Hip Replacement Injuries
- Difficulty standing or walking
- Hip or groin pain
- Joint Dislocation
- Tissue Damage
Wright Products With Reported Problems
- The Wright hip replacement system
- The Wright Profemur® Total Hip System
- The Wright Conserve Plus Hip Implants
How long do I have to file a Lawsuit Against Wright Medical Technology, Incorporated?
Each state has different statute-of-limitations laws. However, as a general rule, you should bring your lawsuit against the manufacturer within two years of the incident or discovery. Many individuals who have been injured by a Wright Hip Replacement Implants have not yet filed a claim against Wright. Some cases are time sensitive so it is important to be aware of limitations and act accordingly to avoid forfeiture of your right to financial compensation.
To learn more about the Wright Hip Replacement implant, visit our Frequently Asked Question’s page. If you or a loved one sustained a hip replacement injury caused by a Wright Hip Replacement implant, you should consult with a physician immediately.
Chicago Woman Wins $14 million For Injuries Suffered After Taking Yasmin
21 hours ago
by Ani Barsamian, JD
Landlord’s Controversial Provision In Tenant’s Lease: “Premises Shall Not Be Operated As A Gay Or Lesbian Bar”
22 hours ago
by Ani Barsamian, JD
Airbag Maker for GM Was Aware of Dangerous Defects
23 hours ago
by Chris Blankinship, Esq.
- Chicago Woman Wins $14 million For Injuries Suffered After Taking Yasmin
Bankruptcy – Business
Bankruptcy – Personal
Criminal Law – Appellate
Criminal Law – Federal
Criminal Law – State Felony & Misdemeanor
Drunk Driving Defense
Dumb or Weird Laws
2012 Meningitis Outbreak
Biomet Hip Replacement
Smith & Nephew Hip Replacement
Stryker Hip Replacement
Wright Hip Replacement
Intellectual Property Law
Labor & Employment Law
Landlord Tenant Law
Personal Injury – Defendant
Personal Injury – Plaintiff
Social Security Disability
Trending Searches#TBT #ThrowbackThursday constitutional law dangerous-products dangerous or defective products dumb laws estate planning Events that Changed History Family Law FAQ first-amendment Personal Injury - Plaintiff product-recall products liability random laws recall safety recall salmonella strange laws weird laws