The Asian American Rights Committee of California filed suit against the state of California last month, seeking an injunction and declaratory judgment invalidating the state’s new Shark Fin ban.

The law generally makes it a crime for any person to possess without a permit (which is generally only available for educational or scientific purposes), or to sell, offer for sale, trade, or distribute, a shark fin. It does have a window of exception, which allows certain people currently in possession of fins, i.e. acquired prior to January 1, 2012, to sell them until July 2013. After that, possession is punishable by up to six months in prison and a $1,000 fine.

The group represents an estimated 90% of California’s Department of Fish and Game licensed and recognized Shark Fin receivers, wholesalers, and processors. The group believes that it supplies nearly 100% of the fins consumed within California, and many members also supply most major cities within the U.S.

The complaint states that, “Shark fin soup is an Asian cultural delicacy with origins in the Ming Dynasty. It is a ceremonial centerpiece of traditional Chinese banquets, as well as celebrations of weddings and birthdays of one’s elders.”

The group argues that the ban violates the Commerce Clause, in that a significant number of the fins are sold across state lines,  and that it further constitutes a regulatory taking, in that many of the group’s members have invested substantially in their businesses (including capital, inventory, and goodwill), some for over 35 years.

Additionally, the group argues that the law is duplicative in that what it sets out to accomplish, regulating the manner in which sharks are fished, is already addressed in separate U.S. laws. In order to prevent the practice of fishermen removing the animal’s fins and then throwing them back into the ocean to die a slow death, U.S. laws already require that sharks caught by U.S. vessels be brought back whole, and those imported into California must be in accordance with the federal Shark Finning Prohibition Act of 2000 and the Shark Conservation Act of 2011.

I am incredibly interested to see how this one turns out.

  • JaFo

    Interesting that the Asian American Rights Committee of California filed this suit using the ICC as the main arguement.You can see that they have no interest in protecting anything but themselves.

  • Mary Sproat

    Asian Culture is a pure hogwash excuse. Money is what it’s all about. The Asian People do not have a very good reputation regarding preserving the planet or endangered animals. They are a [slash and burn people.] Consider the loss of Rhinos for their horn, tigers lost for their penises, whales killed for “scientific purposes” bears imprisoned for life for their bile, not to mention dogs and cats for all sorts of purposes. No, we all had to give up cultural things for the sake of the earth and because we overcame,via knowledge, our superstitions. Enough!

  • Patric Douglas

    Wow Mary,

    Do you have any idea how ugly, racist, and low brow street gutter nonsense that comment is of yours?

    “They are a slash and burn people.”

    Nice, really nice. Makes me so proud to be a white, middle class, conservationist when I see starkly ugly comments like these on the Internet festering for years.

    You didn’t happen to be in Toronto recently did you?

    http://www.torontosun.com/2011/12/01/poison-threat-over-to-shark-fin-use

    For you and all those like you, stop the hate, stop the madness.

Posting tweet...

Powered by Twitter Tools

Archives