We love our pets, our dogs, cats, fish, birds, and even snakes, but a new law proposed in San Francisco may ban the sale of all pets. Yes, all pets, every fish, gerbil, rat, pony, bunny or anything else that flies, crawls, wags, slithers, swims or runs, would be included into this law.
What Is The Humane Pet Acquisition Proposal?
The proposal, pushed forward originally to curtail puppy mills and kitten factories, has now been broadened to include all animals with fur or feathers. Originally, the proposal was designed to ban the sale of all pets in the city in order to encourage the adoption of unwanted creatures from shelters and rescue organizations. There is one caveat to this proposal, snake food.
Additionally, the proposal would not affect the selling of live animals for eventual human consumption. This means markets could continue selling live fish, poultry, turtles or seafood.
Why Ban All Pet Sales?
There are a few reasons for this proposal banning pet sales. This includes the concerns of the San Francisco Animal Care and Control agency which supports this ban, especially on “smalls”- animals like hamsters, which are euthanized at her city shelter at a higher percentage. The SPCA in San Francisco says that this is likely to have little impact on actual pet stores, since there are only a handful in San Francisco that sell animals of any kind.
Others are against this plan claiming it will hurt their business. Jonathan Ito, a pet store owner, claims that “it would put us out of business and our employees out of work.” He doesn’t believe that the pet stores cause the overcrowding at the shelters and argues against some who claim that parents impulsively buy small, cute creatures that will later be tossed aside by bored children.
What do you think? Should the sale of pets be prohibited?



New Posts
-
5 Dead in Atlanta Spa Suspected Murder-Suicide
21 hours ago
by Justin Witzmann
-
Recently Recalled Food Products
21 hours ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
Indiana Court of Appeals Issues Ruling on Anonymous Commenter Defamation Case
21 hours ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
ACA Religious Exemption Applies To Religious Schools?
21 hours ago
by Justin Witzmann
-
11 Abused Children Removed From Texas Home
21 hours ago
by Justin Witzmann
-
5 Dead in Atlanta Spa Suspected Murder-Suicide
Facebook Fans
Popular Posts
- Virginia to Consider Law Requiring Ultrasound Before Abortion (142 views)
- How a Couple of Photos Turned a Tourist into a Suspected Terrorist (138 views)
- Antidepressants, such as Prozac, Linked to Birth Defects (109 views)
- Police Arrest Suspect In Breyer Robbery (106 views)
- FDA Warns Multaq is Linked to Serious Cardiovascular Harm and Death (105 views)
Topics
Attorney Marketing (4)
Automobile Accidents (47)
Aviation Accidents/Disasters (25)
Bankruptcy Law (45)
Brain Injury / Brain Trauma (47)
Business Law (86)
CA suits (47)
Catastrophic Injury (86)
Celebrity (40)
Class Actions (75)
Constitutional (108)
Corporate & Securities Law (24)
Criminal Law (237)
Current Events (333)
Dangerous Products / Defective Products (165)
Divorce (15)
Dog Bites (11)
DoOver (30)
Drugs (22)
Drunk Driving (49)
DUI (51)
Dumb or Weird Laws (26)
DWI (45)
Education (13)
En Español (7)
Entertainment Law (13)
Estate Planning (31)
Family Law (66)
Federal (158)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
General (384)
Historical Cases (6)
How-To's (24)
immigration (12)
Immigration Law (40)
Intellectual Property (19)
Labor & Employment Law (54)
Landlord – Tenant (15)
Law Enforcement (6)
LawSmart (3)
Lead Counsel (729)
Lead Counsel Guest Attorneys (114)
Lead Counsel Corner (1006)
Lead Counsel News (319)
Legal Trends (96)
Litigation (133)
Medical Malpractice (52)
OUI (13)
Personal Injury (181)
Press Releases (25)
Prisons (4)
Privacy (32)
Products Liability (80)
Recall (136)
Slip and Fall / Trip and Fall (39)
Spinal Cord Injury (31)
Sports (9)
Tax Law (18)
Torts (36)
Unfair Insurance Practices / Insurance Bad Faith (12)
Workers' Compensation (22)
Wrongful Death (92)







