As the east coast continues to dig themselves out of the massive snow storm that has hit and cancelled over 5,000 flights, we are inundated with pictures and videos of people who are stranded at the airport. Many of these stories are of people on their way to exotic honeymoons, home to visit family, or some other tear-jerking story. But what about the majority of people? The business travelers who are missing meetings, the travelers who have missed connections and hotel bookings, what can they do?
Rebook Your Flight
There are tons of websites out there telling you what to do in case your flight is cancelled. Outside of the sage wisdom of “check your flight before you leave,” your options are somewhat limited if your flight is cancelled due to the weather. Often-times, the airline will allow you to rebook on a different flight at no extra charge (these charges could run into the hundreds of dollars otherwise). However, without knowing the extent of the weather delay and the fact that most flights are incredibly full, you may not be able to get on another flight in time to make your meeting or vacation plans. Most airlines, like Continental, will allow you to rebook your flight, free of charge, after a certain time, and usually for give you the option to schedule the flight anytime within a year. This would not be a breach of contract because the weather is deemed an “act of god.”
Flight Cancelled For Weather Related Reasons
Unfortunately, when your flight is cancelled, you have limited options. Most airlines will allow you to standby for a different flight or to try to rebook a different flight. You are only owed the “contract of carriage” which allows you the above listed options or a refund of your ticket (but not hotels, etc). Depending on what the weather situation is, this could mean just taking a flight that leaves a little later or the next day, or a flight that doesn’t leave for another week (right now Continental and United are allowing rebooking beginning January 5).
You Don’t Even Get A Bag Of Peanuts
You are owed only a seat on an airplane at some point, even if you are stuck in the airport over night. This means, no food vouchers, no overnight accommodations, you might not be able to get to your checked bag, so you might not have a fresh set of clothes, and no transfer to another airline. That being said, some airlines do try to provide things like blankets and water, some hotels near the airport have “distressed” traveler discounts (though in the case of a major airport like Newark, there are far too many people for the local hotel). However, despite the airline treating people like cattle, there is no basis of a lawsuit since you’ve agreed to the “contract of carriage” with the airline by purchasing your plane ticket.
What do you think, should airlines have to pay if there is a weather delay? Even though the airlines have no control over the weather, should they still be liable for missed vacations?



2 Responses to Flight Cancelled By Weather? Can You Sue?
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
New Posts
-
5 Dead in Atlanta Spa Suspected Murder-Suicide
21 hours ago
by Justin Witzmann
-
Recently Recalled Food Products
21 hours ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
Indiana Court of Appeals Issues Ruling on Anonymous Commenter Defamation Case
21 hours ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
ACA Religious Exemption Applies To Religious Schools?
21 hours ago
by Justin Witzmann
-
11 Abused Children Removed From Texas Home
21 hours ago
by Justin Witzmann
-
5 Dead in Atlanta Spa Suspected Murder-Suicide
Facebook Fans
Popular Posts
- Virginia to Consider Law Requiring Ultrasound Before Abortion (144 views)
- How a Couple of Photos Turned a Tourist into a Suspected Terrorist (138 views)
- Antidepressants, such as Prozac, Linked to Birth Defects (109 views)
- Police Arrest Suspect In Breyer Robbery (106 views)
- FDA Warns Multaq is Linked to Serious Cardiovascular Harm and Death (105 views)
Topics
Attorney Marketing (4)
Automobile Accidents (47)
Aviation Accidents/Disasters (25)
Bankruptcy Law (45)
Brain Injury / Brain Trauma (47)
Business Law (86)
CA suits (47)
Catastrophic Injury (86)
Celebrity (40)
Class Actions (75)
Constitutional (108)
Corporate & Securities Law (24)
Criminal Law (237)
Current Events (333)
Dangerous Products / Defective Products (165)
Divorce (15)
Dog Bites (11)
DoOver (30)
Drugs (22)
Drunk Driving (49)
DUI (51)
Dumb or Weird Laws (26)
DWI (45)
Education (13)
En Español (7)
Entertainment Law (13)
Estate Planning (31)
Family Law (66)
Federal (158)
Frequently Asked Questions (12)
General (384)
Historical Cases (6)
How-To's (24)
immigration (12)
Immigration Law (40)
Intellectual Property (19)
Labor & Employment Law (54)
Landlord – Tenant (15)
Law Enforcement (6)
LawSmart (3)
Lead Counsel (729)
Lead Counsel Guest Attorneys (114)
Lead Counsel Corner (1006)
Lead Counsel News (319)
Legal Trends (96)
Litigation (133)
Medical Malpractice (52)
OUI (13)
Personal Injury (181)
Press Releases (25)
Prisons (4)
Privacy (32)
Products Liability (80)
Recall (136)
Slip and Fall / Trip and Fall (39)
Spinal Cord Injury (31)
Sports (9)
Tax Law (18)
Torts (36)
Unfair Insurance Practices / Insurance Bad Faith (12)
Workers' Compensation (22)
Wrongful Death (92)








Based on the way passengers are treated, I say yes. The airlines took all their planes out of the Northeast. Thus, there are not enough flights to getting people out. The airlines could have easily paid for trains for passengers to other airports to get them out to different airports. But they didn’t. Sadly, this is this is the problem with standard form contracts. It’s “take it or leave it,” there is no way to negotiate something that is fair. A customer who got stuck in traffic due to the rain who missed his flight is not allowed to cite an “act of God” for missing his flight. I feel airlines are liable, and should have to pay for accommodations for its customers whether the plane has mechanical issues or if there are weather issues. Just as how cable companies deal with parking tickets when there is no parking in the city, this should just be considered the cost of doing business.
Reply
Your ticket terms may cover the issue. The treatment of the passengers in their charge is an entirely different matter. Weighing the security issues vs. the neglect of passenger needs may be a factor. The horror stories of long delays on tarmacs are distressing. On the other hand do you really want to fly when all safety factors are not in your favor?
Reply