By: LINDSEY O’NEILL, ESQ.
The first ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 is coming up…. it will be held February 5, 2010 at the Walt Disney World Dolphin Hotel. There are some very interesting topics proposed to be discussed, particularly with regard to whether existing ethics rules adequately address the practice of law in the era of advanced technology. Specifically, the commission hopes to address issues including virtual law firms, the use of social networking sites by lawyers and law firms, and publishing legal information online. (See the Commission’s full Preliminary Issues Outline.) The Commission’s website maintains that it will “….perform a thorough review of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and the U.S. system of lawyer regulation in the context of advances in technology…” All in all, the Commission expects to spend about three years to thoroughly research/analyze the issues and develop proposed policies and rules that will “… allow lawyers to better serve their clients, the courts and the public now and well into the future.”
The Commission has also set up a list serve, which you can join to receive periodic updates on the issues, participate in discussions, review and comment on draft rules, and learn about meetings and other forums. This is an opportunity for lawyers to get out of “stands” and onto the “court”…. and participate in what the rules should be! Let’s embrace the advances of technology with respect for the profession, for clients’ needs and for the public’s access to legal information and lawyers in their communities.



One Response to ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 to Review Ethical Rules in the Age of Advanced Technology
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
New Posts
-
Power Lunches Losing Popularity Among Lawyers?
2 days ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
Weird Law of the Day: Psychiatrists Must Dress as Wizards When Testifying
2 days ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
Current Legal Event: Brown Family Has Standing to Challenge Utah’s Polygamy Statute
3 days ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
Washington Legislature Approves Gay Marriage
3 days ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
Recently Recalled Food Products
4 days ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
Power Lunches Losing Popularity Among Lawyers?
Facebook Fans
Popular Posts
- Is a Captain Legally Obligated to Stay Aboard His Ship After a Crash? (32855 views)
- Pfizer Recalls Birth Control Pills (337 views)
- Pair Denied Entry into the United States Due to Tweets (275 views)
- California Police Officer Shot And Killed By Fellow Officers (245 views)
- Partying Pictures on Facebook Lead to Denial of Workers' Compensation Benefits (221 views)
Topics
Attorney Marketing (4)
Automobile Accidents (47)
Aviation Accidents/Disasters (25)
Bankruptcy Law (45)
Brain Injury / Brain Trauma (47)
Business Law (86)
CA suits (47)
Catastrophic Injury (84)
Celebrity (39)
Class Actions (72)
Constitutional (103)
Corporate & Securities Law (24)
Criminal Law (231)
Current Events (316)
Dangerous Products / Defective Products (160)
Divorce (14)
Dog Bites (11)
DoOver (30)
Drugs (22)
Drunk Driving (49)
DUI (51)
Dumb or Weird Laws (25)
DWI (45)
Education (13)
En Español (7)
Entertainment Law (13)
Estate Planning (31)
Family Law (66)
Federal (158)
Frequently Asked Questions (11)
General (379)
Historical Cases (5)
How-To's (24)
immigration (12)
Immigration Law (40)
Intellectual Property (18)
Labor & Employment Law (54)
Landlord – Tenant (15)
Law Enforcement (6)
LawSmart (3)
Lead Counsel (703)
Lead Counsel Guest Attorneys (114)
Lead Counsel Corner (980)
Lead Counsel News (310)
Legal Trends (95)
Litigation (133)
Medical Malpractice (52)
OUI (13)
Personal Injury (179)
Press Releases (25)
Prisons (4)
Privacy (31)
Products Liability (75)
Recall (134)
Slip and Fall / Trip and Fall (39)
Spinal Cord Injury (31)
Sports (7)
Tax Law (17)
Torts (36)
Unfair Insurance Practices / Insurance Bad Faith (12)
Workers' Compensation (22)
Wrongful Death (91)









This is kinda similar to the tenor of the discussion going on over at http://www.verdict.org – kinda interesting to see different groups coming to the same conclusion.
Reply