Today the Consumer Products Safety Commission (CPSC) touted the dramatic success of a law that was passed over 35 years ago. In order to protect children from accidentally ingesting medicines and other dangerous products Congress passed the Poison Prevention Packaging Act in 1970. It mandated that specific products be packaged in child-resistant packaging. According to the CPSC, when the law took affect in 1972 the deaths of 216 children under the age of 5 were due to accidental poisoning. In 2005, the most recent data available, the number had shrunk to 31 deaths, a drop of 86%, even while the population of the US jumped from 209 million to over 300 million.
After a dramatic increase in the number of products recalled in 2007 due to lead paint levels in toys Congress passed similar legislation dealing with lead paint. The Consumer Product Reform Act of 2007 requires companies that manufacture products designed for children 12 years of age and younger to dramatically cut the amount of lead used in the product’s paint. Current law allows for lead levels of 600 parts per million. The new law sets a goal for lead content in children’s toys of 100 parts per million by 2011.
Within four years of passing the Poison Prevention Packaging Act accidental child poisonings fell to 105 by 1976, a drop of 51%. This fact hopefully foreshadows the results we will see from the passage of the Consumer Product Reform Act. But passing a law is not the end all be all.
There are plenty of laws regulating products and activities which have not had the success of the Poison Prevention Packaging Act. In the 1970s when the Poison Prevention Act was initially passed most products sold in the US were also manufactured here. Enforcement of that statute was far easier during the crucial first few years than it would be today when most products sold in the US are manufactured overseas, 80% of children’s toys sold in the US in 2007 were manufactured in China.
-
http://www.abc-packaging.com Mike
New Posts
-
Read This Before You Eat Lunch!
7 hours ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
More Ado About Trusts
7 hours ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
What Does “Family Law” Really Mean?
1 day ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
How Does a “Typical” Adoption Work?
1 day ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
Lesbians Unable to Adopt Birth Children in Florida
2 days ago
by Caitlyn Obolsky, Esq.
-
Read This Before You Eat Lunch!
Popular Posts
Topics
Attorney Marketing (4)
Automobile Accidents (52)
Aviation Accidents/Disasters (26)
Bankruptcy Law (47)
Brain Injury / Brain Trauma (47)
Business Law (87)
CA suits (49)
Catastrophic Injury (87)
Celebrity (44)
Class Actions (78)
Constitutional (140)
Corporate & Securities Law (24)
Criminal Law (292)
Current Events (498)
Dangerous Products / Defective Products (186)
Divorce (18)
Dog Bites (11)
DoOver (30)
Drugs (22)
Drunk Driving (50)
DUI (52)
Dumb or Weird Laws (33)
DWI (45)
Education (13)
En Español (7)
Entertainment Law (14)
Estate Planning (56)
Family Law (75)
Federal (166)
Findlaw (1)
Frequently Asked Questions (14)
General (427)
Historical Cases (11)
How-To's (28)
immigration (21)
Immigration Law (50)
Intellectual Property (24)
International (5)
Labor & Employment Law (61)
Landlord – Tenant (15)
Law Enforcement (8)
LawSmart (3)
Lead Counsel (974)
Lead Counsel Guest Attorneys (114)
Lead Counsel Corner (1250)
Lead Counsel News (407)
Legal Trends (96)
Litigation (134)
Medical Malpractice (54)
Military (4)
OUI (13)
Personal Injury (186)
Press Releases (26)
Prisons (4)
Privacy (35)
Products Liability (92)
Recall (147)
Slip and Fall / Trip and Fall (42)
Spinal Cord Injury (32)
Sports (24)
Tax Law (23)
Torts (37)
Unfair Insurance Practices / Insurance Bad Faith (12)
Workers' Compensation (22)
Wrongful Death (94)
Facebook Fans







